Koch v. Wilcoxon
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Charles Wellborn, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying to defendant Doherty a new trial.
Plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to a certain lot of land in the county of Los Angeles. The main facts, as found by the trial judge and shown by the evidence in the bill of exceptions, are in brief as follows: Marcelle Koch, being the owner of the lot in question, while in the city of San Diego was interviewed by defendant Wilcoxon, who claimed to have a purchaser for the lot in Los Angeles County. Wilcoxon stated that his purchaser would pay the sum of six thousand five…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Riley v. MartinelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Lee v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Hancock v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Murphy v. ClaytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Kimball v. TrippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stearns v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Rexburg Lumber Co. v. PurringtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
- Hansen v. G & G TRUCKING CO.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Wardrobe v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Donian v. DanielianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.