Legal Opinion

Kpmg LLP v. Cocchi

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 7, 2011No. 10-1521PublishedCited by 192 opinions

1Per curiam

Agreements to arbitrate that fall within the scope and coverage of the Federal Arbitration Act (Act), 9 U. S. C. § 1 et seq., must be enforced in state and federal courts. State courts, then, “have a prominent role to play as enforcers of agreements to arbitrate.” Vaden v. Discover Bank, 556 U. S. 49, 59 (2009).

The Act has been interpreted to require that if a dispute presents multiple claims, some arbitrable and some not, the former must be sent to arbitration even if this will lead to piecemeal litigation. See Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. Byrd, 470 U. S. 213, 217 (1985). From this it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Vaden v. Discover BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by192 opinions

  1. Chorley Enterprises, Inc. v. Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  2. Christopher L. Gore v. Alltel CommuCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  3. Home Buyers Warranty Corporation v. Lois HannaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  4. Daly v. Citigroup Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  5. Taylor v. Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

187 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API