Legal Opinion

Bruno v. Bruno

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 16, 1953No. 5-10PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ward, Justice.

The suit for divorce brought by appellee against appellant presents for our consideration, on this appeal, the force and effect of an alleged “ceremonial” marriage of the two parties in 1946 in the state of New York.

First,., a summary of the factual background to this proceeding will help to clarify that which follows. In 1944 appellee, Frances Riffle Bruno (then Frances Shelby) was married to Roy E. Shelby and was living with him in Little Rock.

In the latter part of 1944 Roy E. Shelby entered the Army, and in October, 1944, he was sent overseas, leaving his wife in Little Rock.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Evatt v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  2. Estes v. MerrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  3. Cooper v. McCoySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  4. Lathan v. LathanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. MeridethSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Powell v. LaneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Yocum v. HolmesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  3. Smiley v. SmileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. Everlene STOKES, Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. Higgins v. HigginsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API