American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee v. Thornburgh
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POOLE, Circuit Judge:
The government appeals from the district court’s declaratory judgment that sections 241(a)(6)(D), (F)(iii), (G)(v), and (H) of the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952, codified in 8 U.S.C. §§ 1251(a)(6)(D), (F)(iii), (G)(v), and (H) (the Act), are unconstitutionally overbroad in violation of the first amendment.1 We affirm in part, reverse in part, vacate the judgment and remand for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
FACTS
In January 1987, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) detained plaintiffs-appellees (individual appellees), Bashar Amer, Ayman Mustafa…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State of California v. the Little Sisters of the PoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Daniel B. Salameda and Angelita C. Salameda v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Gemtel Corporation Gemtel Wdch Hotel Associates v. Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Canatella v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.