Legal Opinion
Woodard v. Mennella
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 25, 1994No. CV-93-2741PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
Plaintiff pro se Victor Woodard commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by filing a Complaint on June 21, 1993. As the basis for his Complaint, plaintiff alleges that defendants Thomas L. Mennella, Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County (“Mennella”) and Paul Tima, Motion Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County (“Toma”) 1 violated his rights by failing to file his pro se motion for a writ of habeas corpus because he was represented by counsel in a pending state court criminal action. Defendants now move for summary judgment…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McKnight v. MiddletonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Garcia v. PughDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Curry v. Castillo (In Re Castillo)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2000