Legal Opinion
Garcia v. Pugh
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 13, 1996No. Civil Action 96-4782PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
In June 1996, Felipe Manuel Torres Garcia filed a habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Because an error by the Clerk’s Office of this court had delayed Mr. Torres Garcia’s filing, 1 I requested that the government respond to Mr: Torres Garcia’s petition in twenty days rather than the customary sixty. The government has complied with that request by filing a “preliminary response” to Mr. Torres Garcia’s petition.
In its response, the government argues that this court should dispose of Mr. Torres Garcia’s petition without reaching…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wilton Chatman-Bey v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- William D. Dunne v. Gary L. HenmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Bradshaw v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Carvajales-Cepeda v. MeissnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- ALEXANDER v. EVANSDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- ALLEN v. SCI ROCKVIEWDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- ATKINS v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI SOMERSETDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- Adobe Systems Incorporated v. NwubahDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.