Legal Opinion

Van House v. Canadian Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 23, 1923No. 23239PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Action for damages for loss of sendees and expenses occasioned by bodily injuries to plaintiff’s wife, due to defendants’ negligence. Plaintiff bad a verdict and defendants appealed from an order denying tbeir motion in tbe alternative for judgment or a new trial.

Plaintiff is tbe husband of Phebe Van House. She was plaintiff in an action against these defendants to recover damages for personal injuries. Defendants’ appeal in that action was beard at tbe same time as this appeal and tbe opinion therein is found on page 59, supra. Our disposition of tbe wife’s case determines all tbe…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wells v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Crouse v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Chicago, D. & G. B. Transit Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  4. McNab v. WallinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. William J. Burns International Detective Agency v. HoltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nadeau v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Dahlin v. KronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Pitzen v. PitzenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API