People v. Hampton
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Justice.
Charles Hampton, the defendant, appeals his convictions for aggravated robbery, conspiracy to commit aggravated robbery, and the commission of a crime of violence. He claims he was denied his statutory right to a speedy trial and that reversible error occurred when the trial court precluded him from eliciting testimony from two alibi witnesses because of his failure to comply with Crim.P. 12.1, which requires timely notification to the prosecuting attorney of the alibi defense and the names and addresses of alibi witnesses. We conclude that the defendant was not denied his…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- People v. CurtisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Hinojos-Mendoza v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- People v. MorleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Golob v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- People v. HamptonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Campbell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.