County of Sacramento v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRISON, J.
The workers’ compensation system is designed to assure benefits to injured workers without the need to resort to a lawsuit. Procedural informality that would make the civil practitioner shudder is normal. But even a “flexible” system must have structure. Here, the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) deprived a party of the benefits of a stipulation. We annul the Board’s decision and remand the matter.
Factual and Procedural Background
Decedent Jodie Weatherall was a probation officer. On March 16, 1991, decedent had a heart attack, from which he died on March 27,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Frankfort General Ins. Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Estate of BainbridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Huston v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Burrows v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Mileikowsky v. Tenet HealthsystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Tamburina v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- County of San Joaquin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.