Legal Opinion

DeNiro v. Gasvoda

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1999No. 98-321PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 This action was tried before the Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Ravalli County, on a claim for breach of contract. Plaintiff, Bill DeNiro, appeals from the District Court’s award of a judgment to defendant, Jay M. Gasvoda. We affirm.

ISSUES

¶2 1. Did the District Court err in finding that the parties mutually agreed to a modification of the length of the road?

¶3 2. Did the District Court err in finding that the parties did not contract for the construction of a roadway six inches above field grade?

¶4 3. Did the District Court err in finding that the parties intended to incorporate the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hellickson v. Barrett Mobile Home Transport, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Hollister v. ForsytheMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Lemley v. AllenMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Roberts v. Mission Valley Concrete Industries, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Mathis v. DainesMontana Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mary J. Baker Revocable Trust v. Cenex Harvest States, Cooperatives, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Tin Cup County Water v. Garden City Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Richards v. JTL Group, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Kurtzenacker v. Davis Surveying, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Conagra, Inc. v. NierenbergMontana Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API