Walker v. Buffandeau
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a juclgmeut of the late District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, iu and for the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Per curiam
The action is to foreclose a mortgage executed by Buffandeau, deceased. With respect to the appellants (defendants Wise and Denigan), the allegation of the complaint is: “The defendants claim some right, title, interest, or estate in or to the said premises, subsequent however, to said mortgage and subject thereto.” To this appellants answered: “ Defendants admit
that they have an interest in said premises by way of mortgage from E. B. Buffandeau, dated the 18th day of April, 1877, to secure a promissory note,” etc. “And they further allege they have no information or belief sufficient to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Coveny v. HaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Humphreys v. McCallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Brown v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Chapman v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1855
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bull v. BrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bank of Ukiah v. Petaluma Sav. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Sheldon v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- In re Bullard's EstateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892