Legal Opinion
Plimpton v. Bank of Jackson Hole
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 26, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00323Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT JEFFREY PLIMPTON, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:20-cv-00323 (VAB) BANK OF JACKSON HOLE, et al, Defendant. RULING AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS Jeffrey Plimpton (“Plaintiff”) filed this action pro se against Bank of Jackson Hole, Ballard Spahr, LLP (“Ballard Spahr”), Gary Barney, Lucas Buckley, DFWU, LLC (“DFWU”), Estate of Patricia A. Lane, Michael Gilbert, Hathaway & Kunz, P.C. (“Hathaway & Kunz”), Charles Hingle, Holland & Hart, LLP (“Holland & Hart”), Colleen Lane, Matthew W. Lane,…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.