Hei v. City of Durand
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether an abutting property owner is liable for injuries resulting from the dangerous condition of a sidewalk *103which was caused by the natural growth of the roots of a tree located on his property.
The applicable statutes are secs. 81.15 and 81.17.1
The case was submitted to the court on stipulated facts. The stipulation provided that at all times material to the action the county was in control and occupancy of the property abutting the sidewalk; that the county owned and maintained a large shade tree immediately adjacent to the sidewalk; that for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. Milwaukee Terminal Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Miller v. Welworth TheatresWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Plesko v. Allied Investment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Sand v. City of Little FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Steeno v. WolffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by9 opinions
- Physicians Plus Insurance v. Midwest Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Physicians Plus Insurance v. Midwest Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- Peppas v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Kull v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Jasenczak v. SchillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.