Plesko v. Allied Investment Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The complaint does not expressly allege that Allied Investment Company owns the “tree border” between the sidewalk and the curb where the elm tree stood. Allied appears to concede, however, that but for the effect of certain ordinances upon which it relies, it owns the fee to the center of the street subject to the city’s easement for highway purposes.
The circuit court considered that the case is ruled by Brown v. Milwaukee Terminal R. Co. (1929), 199 Wis. 575, 224 N. W. 748, 227 N. W. 385. In that case, the plaintiff, who was using the sidewalk, was injured by the fall of a dead and decayed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brown v. Milwaukee Terminal Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Miller v. Welworth TheatresWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Asen v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Andrews v. YoumansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Krejci v. LojeskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Plesko v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Physicians Plus Insurance v. Midwest Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. WolterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
- Physicians Plus Insurance v. Midwest Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- Narsh v. Zirbser Brothers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.