Legal Opinion
Hilda Rodriguez,plaintiffs v. Smithkline Beecham, Their Agents, Officers, Employees and Successors in Interest
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided August 16, 2000No. 99-2031PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is an appeal from the district court’s entry of summary judgment. The district court held that appellant’s sex discrimination claims under the Equal Pay Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 failed as a matter of law and entered judgment in favor of the appellee. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Appellant’s Employment at Smithkline
Appellant Hilda Rodriguez began employment at appellee Smithkline Beecham Pharmaceutical, P.R., Inc. (“Smithkline”) in 1979 as an Analytical Chemist, a grade level C position within Smithkline’s com pensation structure.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Karen Miranda v. B & B Cash Grocery Store, Inc., Karen Miranda v. B & B Cash Grocery Store, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Blizard v. FrechetteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Ahern v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Gu v. Boston Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Poulis Minott v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Rathbun v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Charles Larry Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.