Legal Opinion

Newcomb v. Teske

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 2, 1948No. 34,509PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action wherein a permanent injunction was directed to be issued against defendants Paul E. Teske and Eva Teske, his wife, restraining them from further remodeling a garage into a dwelling on their 50 x 100 foot lot in the village of Hibbing.

The Teskes had made application to the village council for a building permit to so remodel the garage. They had previously altered a single dwelling unit on the same lot into a duplex, so that the remodeling of the garage’ would have resulted in three dwelling…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holzbauer v. RitterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Bouchard v. ZetleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Boehner v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Cohen v. Rosevale Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Josephson v. AutreySupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Elwyn v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  3. In Re StadsvoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. Moore v. PettusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. Anderson v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API