Legal Opinion

Josephson v. Autrey

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 26, 1957PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

96 So.2d 784 (1957)

Norton JOSEPHSON, a Taxpayer of the City of Daytona Beach, Florida, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, Appellant,

v.

Henry AUTREY, Anthony J. Grezik, J. Kermit Coble, Hayward B. Brown, and E.W. Korb, as and constituting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Daytona Beach, Florida; Carl Wetherell, as the duly qualified Building Inspector of the City of Daytona Beach, Florida; The City of Daytona Beach, Florida, a Municipality Organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida; and Ucal W. Cunningham and Minna L. Cunningham, his wife,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Clark v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. City of Miami Beach v. HoganSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Hartnett v. AustinSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  4. Gleason v. Keswick Improvement Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Moriarty v. PoznerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Coral Springs Street Systems, Inc. v. City of SunriseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Renard v. Dade CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  3. Elwyn v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  4. Sandy City v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Boucher v. NovotnySupreme Court of Florida · 1958

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API