Legal Opinion

Gilley v. Southern Research Institute

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 13, 2015No. 1131238PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STUART, Justice.

Richard M. Gilley sued his former employer, Southern Research Institute (“SRI”), seeking compensation he alleged *1216he was owed as a result of his work leading to SRI’s procurement of United States Patent No. 5,407,609 (“the '609 patent”). He subsequently amended his complaint and added SRI’s one-time subsidiary, Brookwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Brook-wood”), and Brookwood’s subsequent owner, SurModics, Inc., in place of fictitiously named defendants. The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of SRI, and Gilley appealed that judgment to this Court. We affirm.

I

Although…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Wilson v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Williams v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  5. Dow v. Alabama Democratic PartySupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. The Money Source Inc. v. Paymap Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API