Gilley v. Southern Research Institute
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
STUART, Justice.
Richard M. Gilley sued his former employer, Southern Research Institute (“SRI”), seeking compensation he alleged *1216he was owed as a result of his work leading to SRI’s procurement of United States Patent No. 5,407,609 (“the '609 patent”). He subsequently amended his complaint and added SRI’s one-time subsidiary, Brookwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Brook-wood”), and Brookwood’s subsequent owner, SurModics, Inc., in place of fictitiously named defendants. The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of SRI, and Gilley appealed that judgment to this Court. We affirm.
I
Although…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Wilson v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Williams v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Dow v. Alabama Democratic PartySupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- The Money Source Inc. v. Paymap Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2018