Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Shabazz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1995No. 94-2668PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(6), and 3-101(B), as well as Gov.Bar V(6)(A)(1). However, we cannot concur in the recommendation to impose an indefinite suspension. In Disciplinary Counsel v. McDonald (1995), 71 Ohio St.3d 628, 629, 646 N.E.2d 819, 820, we disbarred an attorney on motion for default, despite the board’s recommendation to indefinitely suspend, because he had a significant history of professional misconduct and had ignored our previous order of suspension. McDonald requires the same sanction here.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KouryOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. KouryOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ChaversOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. ShabazzOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. MeehanOhio Supreme Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API