Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Miser
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 1, 1926No. File No. 6148PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
A bastardy action was brought against plaintiff in May, 1925, before Ward Soule, a justice of the peace. The complaint was drawn, and proceedings, before the justice, had under sections 2981 to 2990, R. C. 1919, as amended by chapter 137 of the Laws of 1921, commonly known as “the Bastardy Act,” and fully complied with the provisions of that act as amended.
The case was entitled the State of South Dakota v. Verne Thomas, and alleged' the acts of defendant were contrary to certain enumerated provisions of said act, as amended by chapter 137, Session Laws of 1921. A warrant of arrest was issued.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whitney v. RitzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- White v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1889
- State v. FuryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- Harris Manufacturing Co. v. WalshSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1878
- State Bank v. CarltonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SaxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Nelson v. DickensonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Wieber v. HenningsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Wieber v. HenningsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. SaxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950