Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Wieber v. Hennings

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1981No. 13290Published

1DissentMorgan, Justice

I respectfully dissent because the appellant lacks standing on appeal to challenge the decision of the trial court. This is a jurisdictional issue that we can raise sua sponte. Long v. Knight Const. Co., Inc., 262 N.W.2d 207, 209 (S.D.1978).

I have no disagreement with the majority’s discussion or resolution of the constitutional issue, but I am personally opposed to the exercise of our rather awesome authority to declare a legislative act unconstitutional without a full briefing and argument. In this instance, no brief was filed to support the constitutionality of the statute. Moreover, we…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Long v. Knight Const. Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Olesen v. SnyderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Thomas v. MiserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API