Legal Opinion
Churchill v. Muegge
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 18, 1958No. 37734PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARLILE, Justice.
This is an appeal on the original record from an order denying a motion to vacate a judgment. Plaintiff in error is proceeding under 12 O.S.1951 § 1038, which authorizes the court to vacate a void judgment “ * * * at any time, on motion of a party, * * * ”. He-does not contend that any of the other statutory provisions authorizing the vacation of a judgment are applicable.
The judgment roll, to which we are limited in arriving at our conclusion, Scoufos v. Fuller, Okl., 280 P.2d 720, discloses that on December 13, 1945, defendants in error, A. H. and Fleta Muegge, filed their…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Scoufos v. FullerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Deruy v. NoahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Noble v. KahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- State ex rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Douglass v. MounceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nilsen v. Tenneco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Hassell v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Tarnoff v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Westheimer v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Crain v. Farmers United Cooperative PoolSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.