Legal Opinion

Ettinger v. Studevent Hole v. Dice

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1942No. Nos. 27,644, 27,661PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichman, J.

These two cases, consolidated for the purpose of oral argument, involve the validity of what is popularly known as the 1941 “Skip Election Law,” ch. 86, Acts 1941, § 29-1813, et seq., Burns’ 1933 (Supp.), § 11641-1, et seq., Baldwin’s Supp. 1941. While the two trial judges reached different conclusions, the arguments are interrelated and one opinion will suffice for both cases.

Prior to 1933 all city elections were held every four years in the year following presidential elections. Chapter 173, Acts 1933, deferred the time of elections to the second year after the presidential election when…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Williams v. Standard Oil Co. of La.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. People ex rel. Breckon v. Board of Election CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  5. People ex rel. Stuckart v. KnopfIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Welsh, Governor v. SellsIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
  2. FAIRCHILD, PROSECUTING ATTY., ETC. v. SchankeIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State Ex Rel. Gannon v. Lake Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Perry Township v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Harris County Water Control & Improvement District No. 39 v. AlbrightTexas Supreme Court · 1954

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API