Legal Opinion
Paul Fazzini v. Northeast Ohio Correctional Center, Warden, United States Marshals Service, and United States Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 28, 2006No. 05-3868, 05-4618PublishedCited by 259 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Paul Fazzini, a pro se federal prisoner, appeals a district court judgment dismissing his two petitions for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Fazzini argues that the district court erroneously concluded that he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing his habeas petitions. Appellees, the United States Marshals Service and the United States Parole Commission (collectively “appellees”), argue that the district court did not err because Fazzini did not attach a final decision from the National Appeals Board to either…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- James Charles, (98-5747), Movant (98-0539) v. Ernest v. Chandler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Peter Lewis v. Odie Washington, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, Mary Nichols, Richard Gramley, Lieutenant Shaw, and Lieutenant JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Jernigan v. StuchellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by259 opinions
- Garza v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- James Luedtke v. David BerkebileCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Duniek Christian v. Randell WellingtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Jones v. ZenkDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
- Briscoe v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
254 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.