Commonwealth v. Hill
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
Appellant was convicted of conspiracy, assault, and possession of an instrument of crime. The only issue we shall consider on this appeal 1 is whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction of possession of an instrument of crime. 2
On June 7, 1977, at approximately 8:40 p. m., Philadelphia police officer Frank Rowe responded to a call that there was a burglary in progress at a building located at 625 North 2nd Street. Rowe lifted up a rear garage door, which had a broken panel, and entered the building. He observed appellant and another man in a front room;…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LockhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Provident National Bank v. RooklinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. RiosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ShortSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. AycockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. KeysSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. ArtisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. GarwoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.