Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hill

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1979No. 506PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

Appellant was convicted of conspiracy, assault, and possession of an instrument of crime. The only issue we shall consider on this appeal 1 is whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction of possession of an instrument of crime. 2

On June 7, 1977, at approximately 8:40 p. m., Philadelphia police officer Frank Rowe responded to a call that there was a burglary in progress at a building located at 625 North 2nd Street. Rowe lifted up a rear garage door, which had a broken panel, and entered the building. He observed appellant and another man in a front room;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LockhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Provident National Bank v. RooklinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. RiosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ShortSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. AycockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. KeysSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. ArtisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. GarwoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API