Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rios

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1977No. 1067PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, made applicable to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, barred his retrial. We disagree and, therefore, affirm the convictions on the indictments charging robbery, 1 assault, 2 and conspiracy. 3

Appellant also contends that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of possession of instruments of crime. 4 We agree and, therefore, arrest judgment of sentence on this indictment. Finally, we remand for re-sentencing.

On May 25, 1974, at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Gori v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Commonwealth v. LockhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. WarfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Montgomery v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. ShortSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. MorganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. CrockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API