Legal Opinion

Bankers' Life Company v. Horsfall

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1925No. File No. 5615PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDillon, J.

Prior to December 20, 1916, Maude M. Horsfall and her husband, Allen B., negotiated a real estate loan through the Security Bank of Pipestone, Minn. This bank was incorporated under the laws of Minnesota in 1909. A promissory note in the amount of $10,000, and a real estate mortgage to se cure that note were made out at the Security Bank of Pipestone, by its officers, which note and mortgage were executed and delivered by the Horsfalls to the Pipestone bank. The mortgage was acknowledged before a notary public at Flandreau, this state. The note and mortgage were then delivered by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thatcher v. RockwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Wright v. LeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Miller v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Fruth v. BoltSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Root v. SweeneySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rapid City v. Clark Investment Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Union Central Life Insurance v. RahnIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. RichmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  4. F. R. Foster & Son v. BellowsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Levis v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API