Wright v. Lee
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from the circuit court, Lake county. Hon. Frank R. Aikens, Judge. Action for conversion of personal property. Defendants answered justifying the taking under attachments by sheriff. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal. Corson, Judge, concurring specially. The facts are fully stated in the opinion. The requirements of §§ 3190 and 3192, Comp. Laws, in regard to foreign corporations doing business in this state are valid.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the circuit court, Lake county. Hon. Frank R. Aikens, Judge. Action for conversion of personal property. Defendants answered justifying the taking under attachments by sheriff. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal. Corson, Judge, concurring specially. The facts are fully stated in the opinion. The requirements of §§ 3190 and 3192, Comp. Laws, in regard to foreign corporations doing business in this state are valid. Cook on Stockholders, (2d Ed.) § 696; 2 Morawitz on Corp. §§ 611 to 665; May on Ins. § 577; In re Comstock, 3 Sawyer, 218; Bank v. Earle, 13 Pet. 538; Paul v.…
1Opinion of the CourtBennett, J.
This action was originally brought by the plaintiff, as assignee of the La Belle Ranche Horse Importing Company, to recover for the alleged conversion by the defend- ^ ant William Lee, as sheriff of Lake county, of certain goods, merchandise, and property, taken by him from the possession of the plaintiff, the same being the assigned property. The balance of the defendants are the indemnitors of the sheriff. The defendants in their answer justify the taking of the property by the sheriff under several attachments and executions against the assignor. The answer sets forth the proceedings taken…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining & Milling Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Harris v. RunnelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cooper v. Ft. Smith & W. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- State v. American Book Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Vermont Loan & Trust Co. v. HoffmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
- Spinney v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Peter & Burghard Stone Co. v. CarperIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.