Legal Opinion

Union Central Life Insurance v. Rahn

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1941No. 6912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

— Appellants resist the foreclosure by re spondent of its mortgage on land owned by appellants, on the grounds the mortgage and notes securing it are usurious, in that they provide for compound interest, i. e., interest on past due interest, and that respondent is a foreign corporation not qualified to loan money in Idaho. '

The notes did provide for interest on past due interest, but this court has held that it is what interest is paid, not what is contracted or asked, which governs under 26-1906 I. C. A. (United States Building & Loan Association v. Lanzarotti, 47 Idaho 287, 274 Pac. 630;…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Eagle Rock Corp. v. Idamont Hotel Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Adams v. ShirkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
  3. Easton v. Butterfield Live Stock Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. LookingbillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  5. Brunswick Realty Co. v. University Inv. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bethke v. Idaho Sav. & Loan AssociationIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance v. SimsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Levis v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Bethke v. Idaho Sav. & Loan AssociationIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Hunter v. Merger Mines CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API