Legal Opinion
United States v. Andrew Duggan, Eamon Meehan, Gabriel Megahey, and Colm Meehan, Defendants
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 8, 1984No. 922 to 925, Dockets 83-1313, 83-1315, 83-1317 and 83-1318PublishedCited by 139 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEARSE, Circuit Judge:
The principal issues raised in this appeal by alleged agents of the Provisional Irish Republican Army (“PIRA”) concern the constitutionality and proper application of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (“FISA” or the “Act”), 50 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1811 (Supp. V 1981). Defendants Andrew Duggan, Eamon Meehan, Gabriel Megahey, and Colm Meehan appeal from judgments of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, after a jury trial before Charles P. Sifton, Judge. Duggan, Megahey, and Eamon Meehan were convicted of (a)…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- United States v. Sonya Evette SingletonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Shukri BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Clayton Fountain, Thomas E. Silverstein, and Randy K. GometzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Ronald William PeltonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.