Legal Opinion

Spreng v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1917No. Docket No. 24PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Case by Julia Spreng, administratrix of the estate of Frances Spreng, deceased, against the Detroit United Railway for the negligent killing of plaintiff’s intestate. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This case is brought under the survival act to recover damages for injuries received by Mrs. Frances Spreng, on the afternoon of the 8th day of June, 1914, resulting in her death on the 14th day of October following. The trial judge held that while he was “not prepared to say that the motorman in charge of the car was not guilty of negligence,” yet he believed deceased was guilty of contributory negligence, and directed a verdict for defendant. The case is brought here by writ of error.

The sole question is whether the case should have been submitted to the jury under proper instructions. It…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Deneen v. Houghton County Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Putnam v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. McQuisten v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. La Londe v. Trans St. Mary's Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harris v. BernsteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Pampu v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Hershey v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API