Dukes v. Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators & Paperhangers of America, Local Union No. 437
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice BurNett
The plaintiff in error, Dukes, brought this suit against the defendants, the local union, its officers and certain named individuals for having confederated and conspired together to injure him by taking away his means of earning a livelihood and preventing him from obtaining employment.
The original declaration was demurred to and when by motion of the plaintiff the declaration was amended it was again demurred to by the various defendants. The demurrer contained several grounds, all of which boiled into one, are to the proposition that admitting what is said in the declaration there is no…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fry v. McCord Bros.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Evans v. SwaimSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Order of Railway Conductors v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Barnes v. FortTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
- Benton v. Knoxville News-Sentinel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Linda Sue Edwards v. Travelers Insurance of Hartford, Connecticut, P. v. Jackson, III v. Travelers Insurance of Hartford, Connecticut, P. v. Jackson, III v. Travelers Insurance of Hartford, ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Baun v. Lumber & Sawmill Workers Union, Local No. 2740Washington Supreme Court · 1955
- Love and Amos Coal Co. v. United Mine WorkersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.