Legal Opinion

Kalo Inoculant Co. v. Funk Bros. Seed Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 12, 1947No. 9040, 9041PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, manufacturer and vendor of bacterial inoculant for leguminous plants, brought suit for • infringement of patent to Bond No. 2,200,532, issued May 14, 1940, on application filed August 24, 1938, and assigned to plaintiff, against defendant, wholesale and retail dealer in certain leguminous inoculants, alleged to be infringing products manufactured by The Agricultural Laboratories, Inc., of Columbus, Ohio, who assumed control and direction of the defense. The District Court adjudged the claims upon which plaintiff re lied invalid for want of invention,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Sola Electric Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Kemart Corp. v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  3. John H. Emerson v. National Cylinder Gas Company, National Cylinder Gas Company v. John H. Emerson, National Cylinder Gas Company v. John H. EmersonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
  4. Jungersen v. BadenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  5. Application of WorrestCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API