Legal Opinion

Balden v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1909PublishedCited by 13 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from the Criminal Conrt of Davidson County. — W. M. Hart, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

delivered the opinion of the Court..The plaintiff in error was indicted in the criminal court of Davidson county for the larceny of a pistol, of the value of fifteen dollars. He filed his plea in abatement, which was demurred to by the State. The demurrer -was sustained, and the plea in abatement was accordingly disallowed. The case was thereupon tried on its merits, and the plaintiff in error was found guilty of petit larceny, and sentenced to one day’s confinement in the county workhouse. He filed his motion for new trial, which was overruled. He thereupon appealed to this court, and has…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. ByrneTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Poe v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  3. McCampbell v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Durham v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Memphis & State Line Railroad v. Union Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Loudon CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Southern Const. Co. v. HalliburtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Hibbett v. PruittTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Haley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Flynn v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API