Legal Opinion

McCampbell v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1905PublishedCited by 19 opinions

PROM MARION. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Marion County.— S. D. McReynolds, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Beard

There are seven cases coming by appeal made by the plaintiff in error from as many judgments rendered against him in the court below. In each of these cases *101there was a presentment charging him with the sale of intoxicating liquor without first obtaining a license. In one of them, it is contended the judgment should be reversed, because the presentment was signed by only twelve jurors. In Pybos v. State, 3 Humph., 49, it was held that this number of qualified grand jurors could find a valid indictment, under a well-recognized rule of the common law. This is now a statutory rule (section 7055…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zickler v. Union Bank & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Graham v. DeCampSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Bailey v. DraneTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  4. People v. BurtlesonUtah Supreme Court · 1896
  5. State v. MartinTennessee Supreme Court · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. ByrneTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Jenkins v. Loudon CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State Ex Rel. v. CollierTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Spencer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API