Legal Opinion
Floyd W. Gardner v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 19, 1956No. 16219PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.
This action was instituted by the United States against the appellant for the purpose óf collecting civil penalties in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 359 (a) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, 7 U.S.C.A. § 1359 (a). 1 The appellant admittedly harvested from his farm, in 1949, 1950, 1951, and 1953, peanuts in excess of his farm acreage allotments for those years, respectively, and the appellant admittedly did not comply with the requests which he received from the Administrative Agency to account for the disposition of the peanuts.
Based on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Boske v. ComingoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Fussell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- United States v. Roger Ough HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
3Cited by11 opinions
- Garvey v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Corum v. Beth Israel Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Lugo v. SimonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1976
- Frozen Foods Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1972
- Prudential Property & Casualty Co. v. Insurance CommissionDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.