Legal Opinion

In Re Hessinger & Associates

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California

Decided April 18, 1994No. 15-51072PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

ALAN JAROSLOVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.

It is a rare thing for a court to have to write a decision overruling a legal argument which is patently meritless, but circumstances now require exactly that. The law firm of Hessinger & Associates has taken the position that there is an implicit exception to the Bankruptcy Code for attorneys. Hes-singer argues that after it has filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy for a client it is free to enforce a fee contract for its fees entered into before the filing. A written decision is necessary to explain the debtors’ rights to them, as Hessinger’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Plaza Hotel Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1990
  2. Knopfler v. Glidden Co. (In Re Germansen Decorating, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  3. In Re RigginUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re PervizUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
  2. In Re SymesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1994
  3. Hines v. Gordon (In Re Hines)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. In Re MillsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1994
  5. In Re JastremUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API