In Re Mills
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CHARLES G. CASE, II, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This ease involves the adequacy of a Chapter 7 Debtor’s attorney’s fee disclosures, the reasonableness of the fees charged and the question whether a Chapter 7 Debtor’s pre-petition obligation to make post-petition installment payments for pre-petition legal work is discharged. All of these matters are before the court pursuant to an order to show cause directed to debtors’ counsel, Hes-singer & Associates (“Hessinger”), issued upon the application of the United States Trustee.
II. FACTS
Russell Mills works in the construction industry.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gleason v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Ohio v. KovacsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hale v. United States Trustee (In Re Basham)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- In Re MartinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1996
- In Re SymesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1994
- In Re MansfieldUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- In Re NievesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.