Legal Opinion

In Re Mills

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona

Decided June 30, 1994No. Bankruptcy 94-00996-PHX-CGCPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CHARLES G. CASE, II, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This ease involves the adequacy of a Chapter 7 Debtor’s attorney’s fee disclosures, the reasonableness of the fees charged and the question whether a Chapter 7 Debtor’s pre-petition obligation to make post-petition installment payments for pre-petition legal work is discharged. All of these matters are before the court pursuant to an order to show cause directed to debtors’ counsel, Hes-singer & Associates (“Hessinger”), issued upon the application of the United States Trustee.

II. FACTS

Russell Mills works in the construction industry.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Gleason v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Ohio v. KovacsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hale v. United States Trustee (In Re Basham)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. In Re MartinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1996
  3. In Re SymesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1994
  4. In Re MansfieldUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. In Re NievesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API