Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. United States Encaustic Tile Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1886No. 12,629PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Howk, J. —

This was a suit by the appellant, as sole plaintiff, against the appellees, the Encaustic Tile Company and John L. Mothershead, as the receiver of such company, as defendants. The separate demurrer of the Encaustic Tile Company to the appellant’s complaint, for the alleged want of facts therein to constitute a cause of action, was sustained by the court at special term. The appellee Mothershead separately answered in a single special paragraph, to which the appellant’s demurrer, for the alleged want of facts, was overruled by the court in special term. The appellant refused to amend…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fell v. MullerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Cook v. Citizens National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Howard v. WhitmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Horn v. Pere Marquette R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1907
  2. Supreme Sitting of the Order of the Iron Hall v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. State v. Union National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. American Mutual Life Insurance v. MasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. KenneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API