Legal Opinion
Dooley v. Anton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 30, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBastow, J.
This appeal presents the question of the right of defendants to seek damages claimed to have been sustained by reason of a temporary injunction restraining them from picketing at plaintiff’s place of business. As a condition of granting the temporary restraint plaintiff was required to and did cause a surety company bond in the sum of $6,000 to be executed and filed. Following a trial a permanent injunction was granted. We affirmed the order granting the temporary injunction and the judgment affording permanent relief. (7 A D 2d 880.)
Subsequently, the Court of Appeals granted leave to appeal.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- National Labor Relations Board v. Drivers, Chauffeurs, Helpers, Local Union No. 639Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- J. B. Preston Co. v. FunkhouserNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- J. A. Preston Corp. v. Fabrication Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- J. A. Preston Corp. v. Fabrication Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986