Legal Opinion

Ad Hoc Committee of AZ-NM-TX-FL Producers of Gray Portland Cement v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 26, 1994No. Consolidated Court No. 93-05-00273PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Restani, Judge:

This matter is before the court on cross-motions for judgment on the agency record pursuant to USCIT R. 56.2. Plaintiffs, the Ad Hoc Committee of AZ-NM-TX-FL Producers of Gray Portland Cement and National Cement Company of California (collectively “the Committee”) and defendant-intervenor, CEMEX, S.A. (“CEMEX”), challenge the results of the first administrative review of the antidump-ing order in Gray Portland Cement and Clinker from Mexico, 58 Fed. Reg. 25,803 (Dep’t Comm. 1993) (final admin, review). The issues presented are whether pre-sale home market transportation…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Asociacion Colombiana De Exportadores De Flores v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  2. AK Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  3. Ad Hoc Committee of Southern California Producers of Gray Portland Cement v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  4. Peer Bearing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  5. AL Tech Specialty Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API