Legal Opinion

R.D. v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 2010No. 93A02-1005-EX-559PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION, MATHIAS, Judge.

R.D. was laid off by his employer, losing his position as a machinist. Desiring to retrain by obtaining a degree in graphic arts, R.D. fook advantage of the Trade Act of 1974 ("the Trade Act"), and applied to use Trade Adjustment Assistance funding established under the Trade Act to pay for retraining in a graphic arts program at the Art Institute of Indianapolis ("the Art Institute"). The Indiana Department of Workforce Development ("the Department") is responsible to administer the funding available to Indiana residents under the Trade Act and in that capacity, the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McClain v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Quakenbush v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Penny v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Anderson v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Allen v. Department of Workforce Services, Workforce Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perry v. Unemployment Insurance Review BoardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Kevin Perry v. Unemployment Insurance Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development and Indiana Dept. of Workforce Development UI ClaimsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. R.D. v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API