Legal Opinion

Penny v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 18, 2006No. 93A02-0506-EX-577PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*956OPINION

MAY, Judge.

The Indiana Department of Workforce Development ("the Department") determined Sandra Penny failed to disclose earnings while she was receiving unemployment benefits. She was disqualified for unemployment benefits and ordered to repay the excess benefits she received. The Review Board affirmed. Penny asserts on appeal the Review Board should not have penalized her for improperly receiving unemployment benefits because she had immunity pursuant to Ind.Code § 22-4-17-9.

We agree the statute provided Penny immunity, and the Department, having invoked the statute to force Penny to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Merritt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Malinski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Lawson v. Howmet Aluminum Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Art Country Squire, L.L.C. v. Inland Mortgage Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. In Re Direct Contempt of CaitoIndiana Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Indiana State University v. LaFiefIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Now Courier, Inc. v. Review Board of Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Giovanoni v. Review Board of Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. D.B. v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development, Department of Workforce Development, and Anderson Transit System, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Indiana State University v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API