Legal Opinion
Allen v. Department of Workforce Services, Workforce Appeals Board
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided April 21, 2005No. 20040143-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACKSON, Judge:
¶ 1 .James P. Allen seeks review of the Workforce Appeals Board’s (Board) decision that he is ineligible for Trade Adjustment Assistance for Workers (TAA) under the Trade Act of 1974. See 19 U.S.C.A. § 2296 (1998). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Allen worked for nineteen years as a metallurgical engineer, a field that specializes in the extraction of minerals from ore.' For eight years of that time, he was also a supervisor and manager. Before December 2002, when Allen’s employer laid him off, Allen earned $87,500 per year.
¶ 3 Alen applied for numerous engineering jobs…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Printz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Grace Drilling Co. v. Board of ReviewCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rosen v. Saratoga Springs CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Taylorsville City v. Taylorsville City Employee Appeal BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Needle Inc. v. Department of Workforce Services, Workforce Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- R.D. v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- R.D. v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010