Legal Opinion

Eason v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 15, 1993PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAWFORD, Judge.

This case involves the applicability of the Tennessee savings statute to an action brought against a governmental entity under the Tennessee Human Rights Act. On June 24, 1986, plaintiff, Tasha Eason (hereinafter Eason), filed a complaint in the Chancery Court of Shelby County alleging that defendant, Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division of the City of Memphis (MLGW), had refused to reinstate or reemploy her because of her sex and/or race in violation of the Tennessee Human Rights Act, T.C.A. § 4-21-101 et seq., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C., § 2000e et…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Automobile Sales Co. v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Bennett v. Steiner-Liff Iron & Metal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Collier v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water DivisionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  4. Williams v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water DivisionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  5. Anderson v. Memphis Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Larry Sneed v. The City of Red Bank, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Cruse v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Austin v. Shelby County GovernmentCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  4. Boyd v. Tennessee State UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1994
  5. Johnson v. South Central Human Resource AgencyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API