Eason v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
CRAWFORD, Judge.
This case involves the applicability of the Tennessee savings statute to an action brought against a governmental entity under the Tennessee Human Rights Act. On June 24, 1986, plaintiff, Tasha Eason (hereinafter Eason), filed a complaint in the Chancery Court of Shelby County alleging that defendant, Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division of the City of Memphis (MLGW), had refused to reinstate or reemploy her because of her sex and/or race in violation of the Tennessee Human Rights Act, T.C.A. § 4-21-101 et seq., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C., § 2000e et…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Automobile Sales Co. v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
- Bennett v. Steiner-Liff Iron & Metal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Collier v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water DivisionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
- Williams v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water DivisionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
- Anderson v. Memphis Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Larry Sneed v. The City of Red Bank, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- Cruse v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Austin v. Shelby County GovernmentCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- Boyd v. Tennessee State UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1994
- Johnson v. South Central Human Resource AgencyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.