Legal Opinion

Laatsch v. Andree

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 1912No. 7,685PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Prom Lake Superior Court; Virgil S. Reiter, Judge. Action by Ernest Andree against Gus A. Laatsch and another. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLairy, J.

— Appellee brought this action against appellants to recover on a written lease for the unpaid balance of rent claimed to be due. This appeal is taken from a judgment in favor of appellee for $70, and $17 attorney’s fees.

The brief of appellants fails to contain (1) a concise statement of so much of the record as fully presents the errors and exceptions relied on, (2) a condensed recital of the evidence in narrative form, so as to present the substance clear t ly and concisely; (3) or, under a separate heading of each error relied on, separately numbered propositions or points, stated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago Terminal Transfer Railroad v. WaltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Aydelott v. CollingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. NewkirkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Reeves & Co. v. GilletteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Talbott v. Town of New CastleIndiana Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. Berne Hardware Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Newman v. HornerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Hawkins v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. SedwickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API