Petition of Oliver Wolcott
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
Although not expressly stated, the testator’s purpose that during her life, his wife should have the beneficial use of his entire estate, except for $10,000 bequeathed to his sons, is readily apparent. Apart from these legatees, the only others, who might share in the estate are designated not by name, but as members of a class, or as heirs or next of kin, and would take only in the event that the widow survived one or both of the sons. The residue, at the widow’s death, is to be distributed among the testator’s “then living issue in equal shares by right of representation,” a phrase plainly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Curtiss v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
- Bright v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Smith v. FellowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Longwith v. RiggsIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Longworth v. DuffIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re Richardson TrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- In Re Joint E. & S. Dist. Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Findley v. FaliseDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- AMERICAN SECURITY AND TRUST COMPANY v. CramerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1959
- Friedman v. TeplisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.