Legal Opinion
AMERICAN SECURITY AND TRUST COMPANY v. Cramer
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 7, 1959No. Civ. A. 3987-55PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNGDAHL, District Judge.
Six of the eleven 1 defendants before the Court have moved for summary judgment. A hearing has been held and memoranda of points and authorities have been submitted. Plaintiff, trustee of a testamentary trust, is a stakeholder in this controversy among competing heirs. Since all the material facts have been stipulated, 2 the Court is free to render summary judgment.
Abraham D. Hazen, a resident of the District of Columbia, died in the District on December 4, 1901. His will, executed on October 16, 1900, was admitted to probate on March 11, 1902.
Testator was survived…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Landram v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Evans v. OckershausenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Stamper v. . StamperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Shoemaker v. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
- Hilton v. Kinsey Williams v. Kinsey Little Sisters of the Poor v. KinseyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Estate of Dorothy H. Burrough, Deceased. Ann Burrough (Donovan) Cennamo v. American Security and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Riggs National Bank of Washington v. SummerlinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Simmons v. RosemondDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963
- Cennamo v. American Security & Trust Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- The Riggs National Bank Of Washington v. SummerlinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.