Legal Opinion
State v. Rudd
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided February 7, 1994No. 05-93-00438-CRPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Justice.
Charged with driving while intoxicated, ap-pellee moved the court to dismiss the information or to suppress the evidence. She alleged that the State destroyed favorable evidence. The court granted appellee’s motion to suppress. The State contends the trial court erred in granting appellee’s motion because appellee did not carry her burden under applicable Texas law. We reverse the trial court’s order. We remand the cause for further proceedings.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The State charged appellee with driving while intoxicated. Before trial, she filed a motion to dismiss the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1995
- State v. Vasquez, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- Salazar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Dekeimus Jones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.