Bolton v. Goord
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
STEIN, District Judge.
This civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenges the New York State practice of “double-celling” — housing two inmates in a prison cell previously used to house one inmate — at Woodbourne Correctional Facility (‘Woodbourne”) as violative of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Plaintiffs claim that the conditions of confinement for double-celled inmates constitute cruel and unusual punishment proscribed by the Eight Amendment and that double-celling violated…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Walker v. SchultCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Jones v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Dzwonczyk v. Syracuse City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2008
- Canell v. Multnomah CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2001
- Key v. GraysonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.